Gonzalez et al v. United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Fifth Circuit Texas Southern District Gonzalez et al v. United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration

Gonzalez et al v. United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration

Case Number:	1:2006cv00105
Filed:	June 30, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office:	Brownsville Office
Presiding Judge:	Andrew S. Hanen
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 15, 2010	Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(mperez, )
September 29, 2009	Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 34 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Original Complaint, denying as moot 38 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Federal Defendants' Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule and 37 MOTIO N to Stay. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Its Second Amended Original Complaint (Doc. No. 34), as shown in its attached proposed Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 34-2), is GRANTED. 2) The Sched uling Order dated November 5, 2008, is amended as follows: Defendant's Responses to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is due by October 23, 2009. Plaintiff's Reply is due by November 13, 2009. Defendant's Reply is due by December 4, 2009. 3) Defendant's Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule (Doc. No. 37) and Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time for Response to Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. No. 38) are DENIED AS MOOT. (Federal Defend ants' Opposed Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule) MOTION to Stay (Federal Defendants' Opposed Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule) ; Motion-related deadline set re: 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment.( Responses due by 10/23/2009, Replies due by 11/13/2009).(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 15, 2010

Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(mperez, )

September 29, 2009

Filing 39 MEMORANDUM AND OPINION granting 34 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Original Complaint, denying as moot 38 MOTION to Expedite Consideration of Federal Defendants' Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule and 37 MOTIO N to Stay. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Its Second Amended Original Complaint (Doc. No. 34), as shown in its attached proposed Third Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 34-2), is GRANTED. 2) The Sched uling Order dated November 5, 2008, is amended as follows: Defendant's Responses to the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is due by October 23, 2009. Plaintiff's Reply is due by November 13, 2009. Defendant's Reply is due by December 4, 2009. 3) Defendant's Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule (Doc. No. 37) and Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time for Response to Motion for Enlargement of Time (Doc. No. 38) are DENIED AS MOOT. (Federal Defend ants' Opposed Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule) MOTION to Stay (Federal Defendants' Opposed Motion to Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule) ; Motion-related deadline set re: 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment.( Responses due by 10/23/2009, Replies due by 11/13/2009).(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez et al v. United States Department of Commerce National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?