Garza v. Guerra et al
| Gustavo Garza |
| Juan Angel Guerra, County of Willacy and Roy Tamez |
| 1:2008cv00084 |
| February 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Cameron |
| Hilda G Tagle |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 94 First MOTION for New Trial, 93 First MOTION for Judgment Non-Obstante Veredicto Judgment. This court noted supra that the Defendant's motions were not a model of clarity. This Court, with this opinion, overrules any and all points of contention raised by the Defendant, whether specifically addressed and this opinion or not. The Motion for JNOV and Motion for New Trial are therefore overruled in their entirety.(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bcampos, )
|
|
Filing
26
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss. As such, the Court DENIES with prejudice Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' false arrest and false imprisonment claim against Tamez inhis offic ial capacity. Finally, Plaintiff failed to plead the necessary elements of a cause of action against Defendants for civil conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. 1985. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS with prejudice Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's civil conspiracy claim..(Signed by Judge Andrew S. Hanen) Parties notified.(bvasquez, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
