Ramos v. Lucio et al
John Aaron Ramos, Ricardo Jimmy Ramos, Vicente Chaires, II, Rosa Montes Ramos, Rosa Cristina Ramos and Joe Edward Ramos |
Omar Lucio and Cameron County |
1:2008cv00122 |
January 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Brownsville Office |
Cameron |
Hilda G Tagle |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, at this time the only claims that remain pending in the instant action are Plaintiffs' cause of action against Cameron County and Omar Luci o, in his official capacity, for state law violations outlined in Plaintiffs' original complaint. Dkt. No. 1, at 23-28. This Court ORDERS the Clerk to dismiss Defendants Robert Oyervidez, Juan Cortez, III, FNU Garcia, Raul Rodriguez and Refugio Perez from this case.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(mperez, ) |
Filing 46 OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 44 Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to Designate and Produce Report. The case is therefore RE-SET as follows: Pltf Experts, if any, will be named with a report furnished by 10/17/2008 at 9:00 A.M. The Deft Experts, if any, will be named with a report furnished by 11/17/2008 at 9:00 AM. Depositions of expert witnesses must be completed by 12/05/08 at 9:00 AM. Parties to Mediate case by 12/15/2008 at 9:00 AM. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified. (rnieto) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.