Silguero v. Rio Hondo Independent School et al
Jennifer Silguero as Next Friend of T.S. and Jennifer Silguero |
Pedro Tovar Jr, Rio Hondo Independent School District, Rio Hondo Independent School and Pedro Tovar, Jr. |
1:2018cv00128 |
August 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Brownsville Office |
Anderson |
Fernando Rodriguez |
Civil Rights: Education |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Certificate of Interested Parties. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs Certificate of Interested Parties shall be accepted for filing.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Pedro Tovar, Jr, filed.(Garza, Eduardo) |
Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Certificate of Interested Parties by Jennifer Silguero, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/10/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Interested Parties)(Stapleton, Edward) |
Filing 8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Def. Rio Hondo ISD's 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted by Rio Hondo Independent School, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/2/2018. (Ortiz, Leandra) |
Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER Order Granting Rio Hondo ISD's 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can be Granted re: #8 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Def. Rio Hondo ISD's 12(b)(1) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss in Part for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Defendant Pedro Tovar Jr.'s 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Pedro Tovar, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order Granting Defendant Pedro Tovar's Jr.'s 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint)(Garza, Eduardo) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Rio Hondo Independent School, filed.(Ortiz, Leandra) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Pedro Tovar, Jr served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018, filed.(mperez, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/29/2018: #1 Unredacted attachment) (mperez, 1). |
Filing 4 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Rio Hondo Independent School served on 8/16/2018, answer due 9/6/2018, filed.(mperez, 1) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/30/2018 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(dnoriega, 1) |
Summons Issued as to (1) Rio Hondo Independent School District c/o Ismael Garcia, Superintendent of RHISD; (2) Pedro Tovar Jr. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(dnoriega, 1) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(Stapleton, Edward) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-20593184) filed by Jennifer Silguero as Next Friend of T.S..(Stapleton, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.