Padilla v. Quintero
Rosendo Padilla, Jr. |
Thomas Quintero |
1:2019cv00119 |
July 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Ronald G Morgan |
Fernando Rodriguez |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint by Thomas Quintero, filed.(Lopez, Daniel) |
Partial Initial Filing fee received in the amount of $100 re: #6 Order, receipt number BRO007667, filed. (scastillo, 1) |
Filing 12 RETURN of Service Executed as to Hon. Eddie Trevino, Cameron County Judge on 7/23/2019 re: Summons, Complaint, Order, filed.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 11 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Thomas Quintero served on 7/23/2019, answer due 8/13/2019, filed.(dbenavides, 1) |
Filing 10 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 7/18/19 (verified through USPS tracking) re: 7 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (EdnitaPonce, 1) |
Filing 9 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 8 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (dbenavides, 1) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Clerk is ORDERED to issue summons and pursuant to Rule 4(c)(3) of theFederal Rules of Civil Procedure the United States Marshal Service shall serve a copy of the Complaint, summons, and this Order upon Defendant Thomas Quintero at the address provided by Padilla. The United States Marshal Service is further ORDERED to serve by delivery an informational copy of the Complaint, summons and this order upon the Cameron County Judge, Eddie Trevino. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald G Morgan) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Summons Issued as to 1.) Thomas Quintero, 2.) Eddie Trevino, Cameron County Judge. Issued summons delivered to U.S. Marshals, filed.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rosendo Padilla, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/22/2019. (rnieto, 1) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Thomas Quintero (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Rosendo Padilla, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Facts, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibits A-D, #4 Motion to Void Judgment) (rnieto, 1) Modified on 7/2/2019 (rnieto, 1). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Padilla v. Quintero | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rosendo Padilla, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Thomas Quintero | |
Represented By: | Daniel Nemecio Lopez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.