Alfaro v. Pompeo et al
| Carlos Rene ALFARO |
| Michael Pompeo, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and The United States of America |
| 1:2019cv00145 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Lander Baiamonte on behalf of Michael Pompeo, The United States of America, filed. (Baiamonte, Lander) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Carlos Rene Alfaro.(Diez, Jaime) |
| Summons Issued as to (1) Michael Pompeo, (2) William Barr, U.S. Attorney General; (3) Office of the United States Attorney. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(jtabares, 1) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/12/2019 at 02:15 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBITS by Carlos Rene ALFARO, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Diez, Jaime) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Pompeo, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22884353) filed by Carlos Rene ALFARO.(Diez, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
