Mireles v. United States Marshalls Services
| Rodolfo Mireles |
| Marshall Lara and United States Marshalls Services |
| 1:2020cv00011 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 3/10/2020 re: 7 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES: Lead Case No. 1:19-cv-197 and Member Case No. 1:20-cv-11 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1)
|
| Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (EdnitaPonce, 1) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Rodolfo Mireles, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 InmateTrust Fund Account Statement)(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against United States Marshalls Services, Marshall Lara (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Rodolfo Mireles.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
