Flores v. Blinken et al
| Javier Flores |
| Antony J Blinken, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Antony Blinken |
| 1:2021cv00066 |
| May 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mary L. Larakers on behalf of Antony Blinken, United States of America, filed. (Larakers, Mary) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/26/2021 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1 before Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya III(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 1.) Antony Blinken, 2.) U.S. Attorney, 3.) U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Diez, Jaime) |
| Filing 2 SEALED EXHIBITS by Javier Flores, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Part 1- Ex 1- 11, #2 Exhibit Part 2 Ex 12 to 15) (Diez, Jaime) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26399628) filed by Javier Flores.(Diez, Jaime) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
