Thompson v. Cameron Appraisal District
| William Thompson |
| Cameron Appraisal District |
| 1:2021cv00128 |
| August 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 10/03/2021 re: 9 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (dbenavides, 1) |
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter. (Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Cameron Appraisal District, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/18/2021. (Evans, James) |
| Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 8/31/2021 re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (mperez, 1) |
| Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Cameron Appraisal District served on 8/24/2021, answer due 9/14/2021, filed.(mperez, 1) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER entered. ORDERED that Plaintiff William Thompson shall file a statement by no later than September 16, 2021 explaining why he believes the Court possesses federal question jurisdiction. Thompson's failure to comply with this Order will result in the Court considering dismissal of thisaction for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1)
|
| *** #2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons hand-delivered to William Thompson, filed. (mperez, 1) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/2/2021 at 01:30 PM before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(mperez, 1)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cameron Appraisal District filed by William Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mperez, 1) |
| Summons Issued as to Cameron Appraisal District. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(mperez, 1) |
| Initial Filing fee: $402 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number BRO009086, filed. (mperez, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Thompson v. Cameron Appraisal District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Thompson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cameron Appraisal District | |
| Represented By: | James Robert Evans, Jr |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
