Dougherty v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
| Marlene A Dougherty doing business as Law Office of Marlene A. Dougherty |
| U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Unknown John & Jane Doe(s), Lone Star National Bank, Michael Costa, Karla Flores, Unknown Teller and Unknown Private Individuals |
| 1:2021cv00154 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 2511 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
First CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marlene A Dougherty, filed.(Dougherty, Marlene)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER denying request for a temporary restraining order.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/11/2022 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-27158710) filed by Marlene A Dougherty. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dougherty, Marlene)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
