Mendoza v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
| Freedom Mortgage Corporation and Cindy Mendoza |
| 1:2022cv00057 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Ronald G Morgan |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER entered. ORDERED that all of Plaintiff Cindy Mendozas causes of action against Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(DorinaReyna, 1)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Freedom Mortgage Corporation, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Conway, Bradley) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald G Morgan) Parties notified.(mperez, 1)
|
|
CONTINUATION OF DE#4 FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES - ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond Responses due by 6/17/2022.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ronald G Morgan) Parties notified.(mperez, 1)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time Deadline to Respond to PetitionMotions referred to Ronald G Morgan. by Freedom Mortgage Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/8/2022. (Conway, Bradley) |
| Based on Plaintiff's request for withdrawal of preliminary injunction, Injunction Hearing set for 5/17/22 is CANCELED. (balvina, 1) |
|
Filing 2
Order entered by the Court. ORDERED that a hearing on Plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction is set for May 17, 2022, at 1:30 p.m.; and ORDERED that Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation shall remain subject to the restrictions of the state-court Temporary Restraining Order (Doc. 1-2) until May 17, 2022, at 5:00 p.m., or further Order of the Court. Injunction Hearing set for 5/17/2022 before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(DahlilaRodriguez, 1)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 444th Judicial District of Cameron County, case number 2022-DCL-02134 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28161438) filed by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Docket, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of BC, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Conway, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mendoza v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Freedom Mortgage Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Bradley James Conway |
| Represented By: | Dustin C George |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cindy Mendoza | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
