HDR Engineering, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Defendant: Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2022cv00079
Filed: June 30, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rolando Olvera
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 23, 2022 Filing 12 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed.(Petersen, Andrew)
August 23, 2022 Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed.(Petersen, Andrew)
August 23, 2022 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed.(Petersen, Andrew)
August 23, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew L. Petersen on behalf of Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed. (Petersen, Andrew)
July 26, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed.(Ziegler, Gregory)
July 15, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by HDR Engineering, Inc., filed.(Huddleston, John)
July 5, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Professional Service Industries, Inc. served on 7/5/2022, answer due 7/26/2022, filed.(Huddleston, John)
July 5, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Professional Service Industries, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(DorinaReyna, 1) (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/5/2022) (DorinaReyna, 1).
July 1, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Professional Service Industries, Inc., filed.(Huddleston, John)
July 1, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Not Issued as to Professional Service Industries, Inc. due to these deficiencies: Party named on summons is not a named defendant on the case. Attorney or Plaintiff notified of deficiencies by NEF, filed.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
July 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/18/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
June 30, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against HDR Engineering, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28399052) filed by HDR Engineering, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Summons)(Huddleston, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HDR Engineering, Inc. v. Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: HDR Engineering, Inc.
Represented By: John Alex Huddleston
Represented By: Cynthia Ellis Rosen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Professional Service Industries, Inc.
Represented By: Gregory Norman Ziegler
Represented By: Alex Johnathan Bell
Represented By: Andrew Loren Petersen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?