Gomez et al v. Mefra Fletes SA DE CV et al
David Gomez and Ronald Vasquez |
Mefra Fletes SA DE CV and Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez |
1:2022cv00141 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Fernando Rodriguez |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David Gomez, filed.(Garza, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez, Mefra Fletes SA DE CV, filed.(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/10/2023 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 103rd Judicial District Court, case number 2022-DCL-04461 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BTXSDC-28909703) filed by Alberto Guadalupe Alvarez Martinez, Mefra Fletes SA DE CV. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Original Petition, #4 Exhibit Def Mefra OA, #5 Exhibit Def. Alvarez Mtz OA, #6 Exhibit Defs Jury Demand, #7 Exhibit Index of Matters Being Filed)(Rodriguez, Tamara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.