Pettengill v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Katherine Naomi Pettengill |
| Commissioner Of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
| 1:2023cv00030 |
| February 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time answer-transcriptMotions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Commissioner of Social Security, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order order granting extension)(Poole, Eric) |
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Katherine Naomi Pettengill, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/28/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Of Social Security (Commissioner of SSA served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Katherine Naomi Pettengill. (Attachments: #1 In Forma Pauperis, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Palmer, Melissa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
