Calderon et al v. Cenlar FSB
| Jose Angel Calderon and Erika Elizabeth Ramirez |
| Cenlar FSB |
| 1:2023cv00035 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. Accordingly, it is: ORDERED that Defendant Cenlar FSBs Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3) is GRANTED; and ORDERED that Plaintiffs Jose Angel Calderon and Erika Elizabeth Ramirezs causes of action in this matter are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this matter.(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified.(jtabares, 1)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Cenlar FSB, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Proposed Order)(Hopkins, Shelley) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Cenlar FSB, filed.(Hopkins, Shelley) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 103rd District Court, Cameron County, Texas, case number 2023-DCL-00701 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29460724) filed by Cenlar FSB. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Hopkins, Shelley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
