Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Gonzales
| Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB |
| Dora Gonzales a/k/a Dora Saenz, Dora Gonzales and Dora Saenz |
| 1:2023cv00092 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Karen Betancourt |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER on Case Management. Joint Discovery/Case Management Plan due by 9/21/2023. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Betancourt) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Dora Gonzales. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(SaraCelis, 1) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Dora Gonzales a/k/a Dora Saenz, filed.(Frame, Nicholas) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust, filed.(Frame, Nicholas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dora Gonzales a/k/a Dora Saenz (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30111308) filed by Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee of WV 2017-1 Grantor Trust. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
