Rocha v. Doctor Almeida et al
| Jose Rocha, Jr and Santiago Hernandez, Jr. |
| Doctor Almeida, Rafael Lucio, Corp. Rodrigues, Nurses and County Officers |
| 1:2023cv00102 |
| July 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 09/14/2023 re: 19 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DahlilaRodriguez, 1) |
| Filing 21 Letter from Jose Rocha, Jr., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (EdnitaPonce, 1) |
Filing 18
ORDER entered. Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED to submit "a certified copy" of his inmate "trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent)" for the past six months, by October 2, 2023.The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the official in charge of trust fund accounts at the prison in which Plaintiff is confined.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1)
|
| Filing 17 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jose Rocha, Jr, filed. (JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #6 Order, filed by Jose Rocha, Jr. (JenniferLongoria, 1) |
| Filing 15 **This entry was recorded on the wrong docket (and has been terminated).** MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint and Motion to Appoint Attorney by Santiago Hernandez, Jr, filed. Motions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. Motion Docket Date 9/26/2023. (JenniferLongoria, 1) Modified on 9/6/2023 (SaraCelis, 1). |
| Filing 14 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 8 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (JuanitaTabares, 1) |
| Filing 13 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 08/18/2023 re: 11 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DahlilaRodriguez, 1) |
| Filing 12 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 8/10/2023 re: 7 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DorinaReyna, 1) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER and Notice. Hernandez's claims are SEVERED on the basis of improper joinder pursuant to Rule 21. Party Santiago Hernandez, Jr terminated. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1)
|
| Filing 9 Letter from Jose Rocha, Jr. re: Violations While In Custody, filed. (DorinaReyna, 1) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(EdnitaPonce, 1)
|
| Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 7/24/2023 re: 4 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (EfrainGarcia, 1) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (EfrainGarcia, 1) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Jose Rocha, Jr, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/10/2023. (EfrainGarcia, 1) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Corp. Rodrigues, County Officers, Doctor Almeida, Rafael Lucio, Nurses filed by Jose Rocha, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(EfrainGarcia, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
