Rodriguez v. United States of America
| Armando Rodriguez |
| United States of America |
| 1:2023cv00115 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Rolando Olvera |
| Ignacio Torteya |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Certified Mail Receipt Returned re: 10 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DahlilaRodriguez, 1) |
Filing 9
ORDER re: #8 MOTION to Dismiss #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) as to Criminal Case No. 1:19-cr-637 (Defendant No. 4). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), Rodriguezs claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to close this case.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JuanitaTabares, 1)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss #1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) as to Criminal Case No. 1:19-cr-637 (Defendant No. 4) Motions referred to Ignacio Torteya, III. by Armando Rodriguez, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/15/2023. (JuanitaTabares, 1) |
| Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 08/22/2023 re: 5 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DahlilaRodriguez, 1) |
| Filing 6 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 08/17/2023 re: 3 Document(s) Sent - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DahlilaRodriguez, 1) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE entered. Accordingly, Rodriguez is NOTIFIED that, on or before September 16, 2023, he must cure these deficiencies. The Clerk of Court is ORDERED to send Rodriguez a 28 USC 2255 form. Rodriguez is NOTIFIED that if he fails to comply with this Order and Notice, his Motion will be subject to dismissal and the dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b)..(Signed by Magistrate Judge Ignacio Torteya, III) Parties notified.(JuanitaTabares, 1)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (SaraCelis, 1) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) as to Criminal Case No. 1:19-cr-637 (Defendant No. 4) filed by Armando Rodriguez. (SaraCelis, 1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Armando Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Appellate Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
