Cavazos et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Ardelle Cavazos and Juan Cavazos |
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company |
1:2023cv00143 |
September 25, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Rolando Olvera |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ardelle Cavazos, filed.(Gonzalez, Victor) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/16/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, filed.(Smith, Nicholas) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, filed.(Smith, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Court No. IV, Cameron County, case number 2023-CCL-00651 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30559400) filed by Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit A-1, #4 Exhibit A-2, #5 Exhibit A-3, #6 Exhibit A-4, #7 Exhibit B, #8 Exhibit C)(Smith, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.