Jackson Jr. v. General Motors, LLC
Earnest Jackson Jr. |
General Motors LLC and General Motors, LLC |
1:2023cv00173 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Rolando Olvera |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by General Motors, LLC, filed.(Beatty, Matthew) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to General Motors, LLC served on 1/4/2024, answer due 1/25/2024, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to General Motors, LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/16/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Rolando Olvera(Signed by Judge Rolando Olvera) Parties notified.(JenniferLongoria, 1) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to General Motors LLC, filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Earnest Jackson Jr., filed.(Kimmel, Craig) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Motors LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30940012) filed by Earnest Jackson Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kimmel, Craig) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.