Montemayor v. Texas Department of Insurance
| Manuel J Montemayor |
| Texas Department of Insurance |
| 1:2024cv00146 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Fernando Rodriguez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER entered. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Manuel J. Montemayor shall file a response to the Texas Department of Insurance's Motion to Stay Discovery (Doc. 8) no later than December 10, 2024. (Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified. (jrl1)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Stay Discovery by Texas Department of Insurance, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/24/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Behrendt, Rachel) |
| ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 10/12/2024 re: 5 Document(s) Sent, filed. (sac1) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss by Texas Department of Insurance, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Behrendt, Rachel) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Texas Department of Insurance, filed. (Behrendt, Rachel) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/7/2025 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr(Signed by Judge Fernando Rodriguez, Jr) Parties notified. (jrl1)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jrl1) |
| Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (dlr1) Modified on 10/7/2024 (dlr1). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Texas Department of Insurance filed by Manuel J Montemayor. (dlr1) Modified on 10/7/2024 (dlr1). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2024: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jrl1). |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Karen Betancourt randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (dlr1) |
| Initial Filing fee: $405, receipt number 100000714, filed. (edg1) |
| Summons Issued as to Texas Department of Insurance. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed. (jrl1) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Montemayor v. Texas Department of Insurance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Texas Department of Insurance | |
| Represented By: | Rachel Leona Behrendt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Manuel J Montemayor | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
