Gonzalez v. Bay Area Healthcare, et al
Theresa Gonzalez |
Group Bay Area Healthcare Group, LTD doing business as Columbia Bay Area Medical Center and Individually Melvin Howard |
2:2001cv00293 |
July 3, 2001 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Hayden Head |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2001. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 FINAL JUDGMENT , entered. Parties ntfd. ( signed by Judge Hayden W. Head Jr ) (drodrigues) |
Filing 18 ORDER , entered; Plaintiff's motion to remand is granted. This case is remanded to 148th District Court in Nueces County, Texas. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's removal action is denied as moot. Parties notified. Cert. copy to 148th District Court. ( signed by Judge Hayden W. Head Jr ) (drodrigues) |
Case closed (drodrigues) |
Filing 17 Advise to the Court by Theresa Gonzalez , filed (drodrigues) |
Filing 16 MOTION to dismiss by Melvin Howard Nancy Lynne Patterson for defendant, Motion Docket Date 10/14/01 [16-1] motion , filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 15 Docket entry: case has been removed from Judge Head's schedule on 09/26/01 by order of the Court. Parties notified. (fmremp) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing: reset scheduling conference for 2:00 10/9/01 before Judge Hayden W. Head Jr , filed. (fmremp) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing: Motion hearing set for 9/26/01 at 1:15 p.m. on motion to remand and motion to strike before Judge Hayden W. Head Jr , filed. (drodrigues) |
Deadline updated; set motion hearing for 1:15 9/26/01 on motion for remand, motion to strike and scheduling conference (drodrigues) |
Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/Case Management Plan by Theresa Gonzalez, Group Bay Area Healthcare , filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE by Group Bay Area Healthcare to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Motion to Strike, filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 10 Advisory to the Court Regarding Plaintiff's Reply to Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Motion to Strike by Theresa Gonzalez , filed (drodrigues) |
Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Melvin Howard , filed. (drodrigues) |
Case reopened (drodrigues) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting [3-1] motion for protective order , entered; Defendant's Motion for Protective Order is granted and Defendant has until 10 days after the Rule 26(f) meeting to serve any answers and objections to palintiff's First Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admissions. It is also Ordered that Defendant does not waive any right it may have to be in federal court by answering this written discovery. Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Hayden W. Head Jr ) (drodrigues) |
Filing 6 REPLY by Theresa Gonzalez to response to motion to remand and motion to strike, filed (drodrigues) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Theresa Gonzalez , filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Group Bay Area Healthcare , filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 3 MOTION for protective order by Group Bay Area Healthcare Nancy Lynne Patterson for defendant Group Bay Area Healthcare, Motion Docket Date 7/26/01 [3-1] motion , filed. (drodrigues) |
Filing 2 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE AND DISCLOSURE OF INTERESTED PARTIES set scheduling conference for 1:15 9/26/01 before Judge Hayden W. Head Jr , entered; Parties notified. (drodrigues) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Group Bay Area Healthcare filed FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 2 225746 (drodrigues) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.