Homestyle Specialty v. Maxim Healthcare
| Homestyle Specialty Nursing Care, Inc. |
| Hilda Rodriguez and Janie Brown |
| Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., W Dewitt Alsup, John F McCarthy, Jr, Mark Temple and William C Murley |
| 2:2004cv00446 |
| August 23, 2004 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Janis Graham Jack |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2004. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER striking #17 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc..( Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack ) (Attachments: #1) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
|
| Filing 17 AMENDED Original Petition against Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Hilda Rodriguez, Janie Brown filed by Homestyle Specialty Nursing Care, Inc..(drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 16 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to 214th Judicial District Court, executed on: no date specified re: #15 Order on Motion to Remand,, Order on Motion Docket Date, , filed. (drodriguez, ) |
Filing 15
ORDER OF REMAND granting #5 Motion to Remand, terminating #5 Motion Docket Date. The case is hereby remanded to the 214th Judicial District Court of Nueces County, Texas, where it was originally filed and assigned Cause Number 04-4249-F.( Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack ) Parties notified. Cert. copy to 214th Judicial District Court, Nueces County, Texas via cm/rrr.(drodriguez, )
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF CONSENT TO REMOVAL by Hilda Rodriguez, Janie Brown, filed. (drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 13 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hilda Rodriguez, Janie Brown, filed.(drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER by Hilda Rodriguez, Janie Brown, filed.(drodriguez, ) |
Filing 11
ORDER striking #10 JointDiscovery/Case Management Plan.( Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack ) Parties notified.(drodriguez, )
|
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Homestyle Specialty Nursing Care, Inc., Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. , filed.(drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for dismissal of any claims arising under 42 USC 1320 Et Seq. by Homestyle Specialty Nursing Care, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/17/2004. (Attachments: #1)(drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Motion to Remand, Motion Docket Date filed by Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Homestyle Specialty Nursing Care, Inc. , filed. (drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS by Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. , filed. (drodriguez, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to remand to 214th Judicial District Court, Nueces County by Homestyle Specialty, Motion Docket Date 9/19/04 [5-1] motion , filed. Exhibit consists of discovery material - NOT IMAGED. (lcayce) |
Filing 4
ORDER striking [3-1] motion to remand to 214th Judicial District Court, Nueces County , entered; Parties notified. ( signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack ) (lcayce)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to remand to 214th Judicial District Court, Nueces County by Homestyle Specialty, Motion Docket Date 9/13/04 [3-1] motion , filed. (lcayce) |
Filing 2
Order setting Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference on 1:15 10/7/04 before Judge Janis Graham Jack and Order to Disclose Interested Persons, filed. (dterrell)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Maxim Healthcare filed FILING FEE $ 150.00 RECEIPT # 2 232403 (dterrell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.