Sheffield v. Turpen
Plaintiff: Darla Marie Sheffield
Defendant: Stanley A Turpen
Case Number: 2:2008cv00154
Filed: May 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: Coryell
Presiding Judge: Janis Graham Jack
Presiding Judge: Brian L Owsley
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 16, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 9 Memorandum and Recommendations.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
June 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified-including white receipt card.(mserpa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sheffield v. Turpen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darla Marie Sheffield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Stanley A Turpen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?