Hernandez v. Hernandez et al
| Miguel Hernandez and Inez Baltazar Hernandez |
| Inez Baltazar Hernandez, Adelaide Horn, Jon Weizenbaum, Kristi Jordan, Patty Ducayet, Teresa Richard, Barry Waller, Denise Geredine, Iva Benson, Stephanie Nicole Garza, Timothy Lamont Dixon, Vincent Patrick Johnson, Jesse Salazar, DAngelo L. Riley and Guadalupe De La Rosa, Jr. |
| 2:2009cv00163 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Nueces |
| Janis Graham Jack |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 104 Motion to Dismiss.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lsmith, )
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(sscotch, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER granting 82 Motion to Stay. Action is STAYED until the interlocutory appeal is resolved.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Denying 49 Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(srussell, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 7 Motion( Limited Discovery on Defts' qualified immunity defense due by 10/9/2009); granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
