Aguirre v. W.L. Flowers Machine & Welding Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: Ramiro F. Aguirre
Defendant: W.L. Flowers Machine & Welding Co., Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00158
Filed: May 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Jim Wells
Presiding Judge: Janis Graham Jack
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting 4 Motion for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff granted leave to file an amended complaint by 7/14/2011.(Signed by Judge Janis Graham Jack) Parties notified.(lsmith, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aguirre v. W.L. Flowers Machine & Welding Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: W.L. Flowers Machine & Welding Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ramiro F. Aguirre
Represented By: Jon D Brooks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?