Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Grand China Shipping (Hong Kong) Co Ltd et al
| Oldendorff Carriers GmbH & Co. KG |
| Grand China Shipping (Hong Kong) Co Ltd, Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Limited, Offshore Heavy Transport AS and OHT Eagle AS |
| 2:2012cv00074 |
| March 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Brian L Owsley |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
ORDER re: 75 Bill of Costs. Court ORDERS that the bond premiums in the amount of $95,464.00 be stricken from the Defendants' Bill of Costs. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting 56 Sealed Event, adopting 63 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER FOR DISCOVERY Plaintiff's Amended Complaint due by 12/15/2012. Defendants may amend their motion to dismiss and/or submit additional evidence by 12/31/2012. Plaintiff may amend its response to the motion to dismiss and/or submit additional evidence by 1/21/2013.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
