Hall v. Thaler
Petitioner: Christopher Joseph Hall
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Case Number: 2:2012cv00093
Filed: March 26, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Wichita
Presiding Judge: Brian L Owsley
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 16 Memorandum and Recommendations, granting 12 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Petitioner's request for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hall v. Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christopher Joseph Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?