Tolleson v. Livingston et al
| Ted R. Tolleson |
| Brad Livingston and Stuart Jenkins |
| 2:2012cv00201 |
| June 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Bee |
| Brian L Owsley |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO DISMISS ACTION AS MOOT re 90 Sealed Event. Objections to M&R due by 11/12/2014(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified. Copy mailed to pltff w/ receipt card. (lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT denying 68 Motion to Alter Judgment.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER granting 33 Motion and Considers the Plaintiff's Objections 32 . The Court modifies the Order Adopting Memorandum and Recommendation to Grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 30 and Vacates the Final Judgment 31 ..(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION re: 26 Memorandum and Recommendation, 19 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) with Brief in Support. Under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) (D.E. 19) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
