Schneider v. Kaelin et al
| Edwin Gus Schneider |
| Jim Kaelin and M Lt. Gomez |
| TDCJ - Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2012cv00233 |
| July 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Nueces |
| Brian L Owsley |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
OPINION AND ORDER granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(lcayce, )
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO THEIR ANSWERS re 54 Motion to Strike.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, )
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION granting 34 Motion for a Jury Trial.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, )
|
|
Filing
35
OPINION denying 33 Motion to Appoint Counsel.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(amireles, )
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND RETAINING CASE. Pltff's excessive force claim against Lieutenant Gomez, Officer Haller, Officer Martinez, and Officer Sorenson in their individual capacities are retained on the Court's docket, and service shall be ordered on theses defendants. Plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed for failure to state a claim.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian L Owsley) Parties notified.(lsmith, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
