Flores v. Trevino et al
| Erbey Flores |
| Crystal Trevino and Alex Moreno |
| 2:2013cv00298 |
| September 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Bee |
| B. Janice Ellington |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER denying 58 Motion to Dismiss. A trial schedule will be entered by separate order.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: denying 45 MOTION for Sanctions, denying 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment , denying 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment, adopting 50 Memorandum and Recommendations, (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR DENIAL OF QUALIFIED IMMUNITY. Plaintiff's construed motion for summary judgment on the pleadings 30 is denied without prejudice.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(amireles, 2)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER granting 35 Defendant TrevinosMotion to Dismiss State Law Negligence Claims.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(sscotch, 2)
|
|
Filing
31
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 28 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B. Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
