Hess v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
Petitioner: Scott Hess
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 2:2013cv00411
Filed: December 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Jason B. Libby
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 6 OPINION AND ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to SDTX - Brownsville Division; denying as moot 5 MOTION for Discovery MOTION to Stay (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hess v. Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens, Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Scott Hess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?