Casey v. Stephens et al
Plaintiff: William Casey
Defendant: William Stephens and Clint Morris
Case Number: 2:2014cv00013
Filed: January 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Bee
Presiding Judge: Jason B. Libby
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER denying 74 Motion. Plaintiff's appeal of the Magistrate Judges Order is DENIED.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
October 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs Motion of Opposition to the District Judges Ruling on Summary Judgment (D.E. 59 ), construed as a motion to alter or amend the judgment; and the Memorandum Opinion and Order on Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (D.E. [ 58]) is VACATED IN PART as to the grooming-policy RLUIPA claim only. This action is REFERRED to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings in light of the Fifth Circuit decision in Davis v. Davis.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(sscotch, 2)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 62 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT re 59 MOTION of Opposition to the District Judge's Ruling on Summary Judgment. Objections to M&R due by 7/14/2016(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 58 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; granting 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
March 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting 12 MOTION to Dismiss , adopting 29 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER DENYING PENDING NONDISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; denying 24 Motion to Amend; denying 27 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 31 Motion; denying 32 Motion to Stay.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER re: Memorandum and Recommendation 20 . The Magistrate Judge may file a supplemental M&R and Defendant will then be allowed fourteen (14) days to file objections to the supplemental M&R.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Casey v. Stephens et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Casey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clint Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?