Jones v. Stephens
Petitioner: Brian K Jones
Respondent: William Stephens
Case Number: 2:2015cv00077
Filed: February 4, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Corpus Christi Office
County: Bee
Presiding Judge: Jason B. Libby
Presiding Judge: Nelva Gonzales Ramos
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment with Brief in Support, adopting 15 Memorandum and Recommendations. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. In the event that Petitioner requests a Certificate of Appealability, that request is DENIED. (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jones v. Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Brian K Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Stephens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?