Robles et al v. Aransas County Sheriff's Department et al
| Joe Robles and Elvira Robles |
| Aransas County Sheriff's Department, Anthony Ciarletta and Matthew Campbell |
| 2:2015cv00495 |
| December 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Aransas |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court GRANTS Deputy Campbells motion for summary judgment and DISMISSES Plaintiffs claims with prejudice.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(bcortez, 2)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 29 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(sscotch, 2)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST TO AMEND COMPLAINT granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. The amended complaint sh all be filed within 14 days. If Defendants wish to file an amended motion to dismiss based on the amended complaint, they may do so within 14 days of being served the amended complaint.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
