Jackson v. Gutierrez et al
Phillip Jackson |
David Gutierrez and Beth Benoit |
2:2016cv00017 |
January 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Brazoria |
Jason B. Libby |
Hilda G Tagle |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 ORDER re: 77 Memorandum and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's M&R to Deny Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (D.E. 77).(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2) |
Filing 66 ORDER adopting in part 60 Memorandum and Recommendation; granting re: 38 MOTION for Summary Judgment DEFENDANT GUTIERREZ'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT & DEFENDANT GUTIERREZ'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH BRIEF IN SUPPORT,, denying 22 MOTION for Summary Judgment, denying 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2) |
Filing 33 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 11 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court grants Jackson leave to amend his complaint within 28 days after the entry of this order for the sole purpose of dropping Benoit as a defendant. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(lcayce, 2) |
Filing 13 ORDER denying without prejudice 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 10 Motion to Supplement Complaint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby) Parties notified.(amireles, 2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.