Hawkins v. Colvin et al
Melchor Hawkins, Jr. |
Carolyn W. Colvin, Lynn Marten, Richard Terrell, Lisa Tanner, R David Guerrero, John Gilmore, Leroy L. Persohn and Thomas S. Turner |
2:2016cv00271 |
June 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Nueces |
Jason B Libby |
Hilda G Tagle |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 18 Memorandum and Recommendations; and DENIES 17 Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) |
Filing 13 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 11 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three-Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) |
Filing 6 ORDER for Initial Partial Filing Fee and Collection Order as to Melchor Hawkins, Jr.; terminating 4 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified. Copy mailed to TDCJ - Office of the General Counsel.(lcayce, 2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.