Jackson v. Gordy et al
| Aundra B Jackson |
| Bryan Gordy, Phonso J Rayford, Martinez, Jeremy Delossantos, Santiana, Philemon D. Chang, MD, R Martisek, L Webb, Pamela K Wagner, Janet E White, April M Flores, Robert D Schales, Amy M Hernandez, Cory F Jonney and B. Barnett |
| 2:2016cv00338 |
| August 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Bee |
| B Janice Ellington |
| Hilda G Tagle |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 12 61 108 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objection 17 111 ; RETAINS Plaintiff's failure to protect claims against Martinez, De Los Santos, and Santellano; RETAINS Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims against Wagner, White, Flores, and Schales; DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the remaining claims against the remaining defendants; DENIES Wagner, White, and Floress motion to dismiss 26 ; GRANTS Santos, Martinez, and Santellano's motion for summary judgment 71 ; GRANTS Wagner, White, Flores, and Schales's motion for summary judgment 86 ; DENIES Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend complaint 98 ; and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE this action. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) Modified on 3/1/2018 (scavazos, 1).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
