Kearey v. Collier et al
| Mark Jamal Kearey |
| Bryan Collier, Madaline Ortiz, Michael Upshaw, Oliver Bell, Jennifer Smith, Vance Drum, Miguel Martinez, Janet Salles, R B Packard and Christina Luna |
| 2:2017cv00080 |
| February 27, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Corpus Christi Office |
| Bee |
| B Janice Ellington |
| Hilda G Tagle |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 66 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court GRANTS 62 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSES the above-captioned case. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: granting in part 35 Amended MOTION to Dismiss 24 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint , 51 Memorandum and Recommendations (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(mperez, 1)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 15 . The Court DENIES 4 Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and preliminary injunction. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 39 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DENIED 37 Plaintiff's MOTION for Contempt of Court with Sanctions. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
