Marshall v. Menchaca et al
Romarcus Deon Marshall |
Rafael Menchaca and Texas Department Of Criminal Justice |
2:2018cv00044 |
February 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Bee |
B Janice Ellington |
Hilda G Tagle |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 34 Memorandum and Recommendations; DENIES 32 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint; DENIES 33 Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) |
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 18 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE the above-captioned case for failure to state a claim and/or as frivolous and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendant Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice (TDCJ). This dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court therefore INSTRUCTS the Clerk to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at Three_Strikes@txs.uscourts.gov. The Court will direct entry of final judgment separately. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) |
Filing 24 OPINION AND ORDER Denying 23 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint.(Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(srussell, 2) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.