Cardenas-Lira v. Banker et al
Jose Fernando Cardenas-Lira |
Charles A. Banker, III, Lila Michel Garza and Hayden Head |
2:2018cv00144 |
May 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Corpus Christi Office |
Nueces |
B Janice Ellington |
Hilda G Tagle |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 25 Memorandum and Recommendations. The Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, Dkt. No. 23 . The Court SANCTIONS Cardenas-Lira $250.00 because he continues to make frivolous filings despite previous warnings. (Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scastillo, 1) |
Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS re: 12 Memorandum and Recommendations and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's civil rights action as frivolous. The Court therefore DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to forward a copy of this Order to the Manager of the Three Strikes List. The Court SANCTIONS Plaintiff $100.00 for filing this frivolous civil rights action and bars Cardenas-Lira from filing any civil actions in this Court without first satisfying the monetary sanction imposed and obtaining the permission of a district court or magistrate judge to proceed.(Signed by Judge Hilda G Tagle) Parties notified.(scavazos, 1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.