Callis v. Hoke et al
Plaintiff: Reginald Andre Callis
Defendant: (Coach) Supervisor Candice Moore and Administrator Frank Hoke
Case Number: 2:2018cv00284
Filed: September 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: B Janice Ellington
Referring Judge: Hilda G Tagle
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(jmarks, 2)
September 10, 2018 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Reginald Andre Callis. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 10/1/2018, filed. (dterrell, 2)
September 10, 2018 Filing 7 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (dterrell, 2)
September 10, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (dterrell, 2)
September 10, 2018 Filing 5 Case transferred in from Texas Eastern. Case Number 6:18-cv-00376; Case received electronically
September 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF TRANSFER transferring this case forthwith to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Corpus Christi Division, for such other and further proceedings as that court may deem appropriate. Signed by Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell on 9/6/2018. (mjc, )
September 6, 2018 Interdistrict transfer to the Southern District of Texas Corpus Christi Division. (mjc, )
September 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASES. Case reassigned to District Judge Thad Heartfield for all further proceedings. District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III no longer assigned to case. Signed by District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III on 9/4/2018. (saenz, )
July 27, 2018 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Consent form mailed to Plaintiff) (saenz, )
July 26, 2018 Filing 2 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell (saenz, )
July 26, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Frank Hoke, Candice Moore, filed by Reginald Andre Callis.(saenz, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Callis v. Hoke et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: (Coach) Supervisor Candice Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Administrator Frank Hoke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Reginald Andre Callis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?