Devineisd-Rd et al v. Devine Independent School District et al
| Mary Devineisd-Rd Doe, Jim Devineisd-Rd and Jon Devineisd-Rd |
| Devine Independent School District and Curtis "Lynn" Cozby |
| 2:2019cv00123 |
| April 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/26/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos Parties notified.(ChristinaAvila, 2)
|
| Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Curtis Lynn Cozby, filed.(Gorman, Terry) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Devine Independent School District, filed.(Gorman, Terry) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Curtis Lynn Cozby (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22325853) filed by Jon Devineisd-Rd, Curtis Lynn Cozby.(Gorman, Terry) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Devine Independent School District (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-22325850) filed by Jon Devineisd-Rd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gorman, Terry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
