Canales v. Davis
Victor Hugo Canales and Heriberto Rivera-Salazar |
Lorie Davis |
2:2019cv00330 |
October 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
B Janice Ellington |
David S Morales |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS; Petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis (D.E. 4 filed in 2:19cv380) is granted. (Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(vrios, 2) |
Filing 7 ORDER FOR SERVICE ON TX ATTORNEY GENERAL (Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(vrios, 2) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/19/2019: #1 (D.E. 1 filed in 2:19cv380)) (vrios, 2). |
Filing 6 ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION AND REASSIGNMENT: Lead Case No. 2:19cv330 and Member Case No. 2:19cv380 (Signed by Magistrate Judge B Janice Ellington) Parties notified.(mserpa, 2) |
Filing 5 Letter regarding Consent to Proceed to Trial before a Magistrate Judge by Victor Hugo Canales, filed.(vrios, 2) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Victor Hugo Canales. Parties notified. Notice of Compliance due by 11/24/2019, filed. (vrios, 2) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (vrios, 2) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (vrios, 2) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Victor Hugo Canales.(vrios, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.