Nelson v. Davis et al
| Ardell Nelson |
| Phillip Sifuentes, John Doe, Lori Davis, Jovite Rodriguez, Gene Miller and Isaac Kwarteng |
| 2:2019cv00371 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jason B Libby |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Ardell Nelson, filed.(LoriPurifoy, 4) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Case terminated on 12/13/2019 (Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(AnnSalazar, 2)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Ardell Nelson, filed. (KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma PauperisMotions referred to Jason B Libby. by Ardell Nelson, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/30/2019. (KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 350) filed by Ardell Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachments, #2 Additional Attachment, #3 Copy, #4 Envelope)(KelliePapaioannou, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
