Smith v. Phipps
Jerel Smith |
Drew B Phipps |
2:2020cv00158 |
June 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Julie K Hampton |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS CASE AND WITHDRAWING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION #9 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs motion to voluntarily dismiss this action without prejudice because he does not want to pay the filing fee (D.E. 9) is GRANTED. The initial partial filing fee and collection order entered on June 11, 2020 (D.E. 4) is VACATED as to any unpaid portion of the filing fee. Furthermore, the Memorandum and Recommendation filed on June 11, 2020 (D.E. 5) is WITHDRAWN..(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to TDCJOffice of the General Counsel, P.O. Box 13084, Austin, Texas 78711.(legarza, 2) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint Motions referred to Julie K Hampton. by Jerel Smith, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/22/2020. (sguevara, 4) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Writ of Habeas Corpus.(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(amireles, 2) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time filing Federal Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) by Jerel Smith, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/10/2020. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(grogan, 2) |
Filing 6 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrittanyPainschab, 2) |
Filing 5 WITHDRAWN PER DE #10 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION TO DISMISS CASE re #1 Complaint Objections to M&R due by 6/25/2020(Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. COPY OF ORDER SENT TO PLAINTIFF BY REGULAR MAIL WITH WHITE CARD. (fcarbia, 2) Modified on 6/11/2020 (legarza, 2). Modified on 7/2/2020 (legarza, 2). |
Filing 4 VACATED PER DE #10 Initial Partial Filing Fee and Collection Order as to Jerel Smith; terminating #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified. Copy of this Order mailed to TDCJ-Office of the General Counsel, per court's instructions.(srussell, 2) Modified on 7/2/2020 (legarza, 2). |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jerel Smith, filed. (BrittanyPainschab, 2) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Jerel Smith, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/1/2020. (BrittanyPainschab, 2) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Drew B Phipps (Filing fee $ 400) filed by Jerel Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(BrittanyPainschab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Smith v. Phipps | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Drew B Phipps | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jerel Smith | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.