Steven v. Mike Shaw C.C. Motors, Inc. et al
Musgrave Steven and Steven Musgrave |
Mike Shaw Kia and Mike Shaw C.C. Motors, Inc. |
2:2020cv00278 |
November 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time Responses due by 1/15/2021..(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(fcarbia, 2) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Mike Shaw C.C. Motors, Inc., Mike Shaw Kia, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Simmons, Larry) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Mike Shaw C.C. Motors, Inc., Mike Shaw Kia, filed.(Simmons, Larry) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/11/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos Parties notified.(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(ChristinaAvila, 2) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Brooks, Jon) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0541-25490666) filed by Musgrave Steven.(Brooks, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.