Quintanilla v. Martinez
| Abraham Quintanilla, III and A.B. Quintanilla, III |
| Cruz Martinez |
| 2:2021cv00070 |
| April 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Abraham Quintanilla, III, filed.(Greenwell, Andrew) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Thomas K Richards to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Abraham Quintanilla III.(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(srussell, 2)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION Motion & Order Pro Hac Vice by Abraham Quintanilla, III, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/5/2021. (Greenwell, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cruz Martinez. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(vrios, 2) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/1/2021 at 09:00 AM before Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos(Signed by Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos) Parties notified.(vrios, 2)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cruz Martinez(Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26256767) filed by Abraham Quintanilla, III. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Greenwell, Andrew). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
