Matthews v. Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC et al
| Dana Matthews |
| Phyllis Unterbrink and Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC |
| 2:2021cv00071 |
| April 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC, Phyllis Unterbrink, filed.(Webber, Tonya) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC, Phyllis Unterbrink, filed.(Webber, Tonya) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Dana Matthews, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JessieHutchinson, 2) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/1/2021 at 09:00 AM in 3rd Floor Courtroom before Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos. Parties notified.(JessieHutchinson, 2)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC, Phyllis Unterbrink, filed.(Sanford, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baffin Bay Convenience Store, LLC, Phyllis Unterbrink (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0541-26273478) filed by Dana Matthews.(Sanford, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
