Romero v. Stewart et al
| Miguel Romero, Michael Romero and Mike Romero |
| Paul Stewart and Mark Flores |
| 2:2021cv00172 |
| August 12, 2021 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Jason B Libby |
| Nelva Gonzales Ramos |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER STAYING CASE (Signed by Magistrate Judge Jason B Libby) Parties notified.(fcarbia, 2)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton recused. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie K Hampton) Parties notified.(fcarbia, 2)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Exclusion, filed. (JessieHutchinson, 2) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JessieHutchinson, 2) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Miguel Romero, filed. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (JessieHutchinson, 2) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Miguel Romero, filed. Motions referred to Julie K Hampton. Motion Docket Date 9/2/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JessieHutchinson, 2) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Miguel Romero. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(JessieHutchinson, 2) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
